Wednesday, August 26, 2026

Regional Banks Slash Small Business Lending After Credit Losses Hit 46 Basis Points

Regional banks shifted 62% of new loan originations to lower-risk commercial and industrial loans in 2025 after small business charge-offs drove non-performing assets to 46 basis points at First Bank. Banks are reducing small business exposure while targeting owner-occupied real estate and C&I segments.

Regional Banks Slash Small Business Lending After Credit Losses Hit 46 Basis Points
Image generated by AI for illustrative purposes. Not actual footage or photography from the reported events.
Loading stream...

Regional banks redirected loan originations away from small business portfolios in late 2025 after credit stress pushed non-performing assets to 46 basis points from 36 basis points at First Bank in Q4.

Commercial and industrial loans plus owner-occupied real estate comprised 62% of new originations in 2025, according to First Bank executive Peter Cahill. The shift marks a retreat from small business lending after charge-offs concentrated almost exclusively in that segment.

"Charge-offs during 2025 were almost exclusively in the small business portfolio," said First Bank's Andrew Hibshman. The bank experienced $135 million in Q4 loan payoffs, representing 47% of annual payoffs and signaling accelerated portfolio runoff.

Banks are recalibrating risk models as small business borrowers face refinancing pressure and margin compression. First Bank's management guided to charge-offs in a 15-20 basis point range going forward, per CFO John Martin, suggesting elevated credit costs remain embedded in 2026 planning.

The portfolio reallocation favors established commercial borrowers with tangible collateral. Owner-occupied commercial real estate offers property backing, while C&I loans typically serve larger businesses with stronger balance sheets and cash flow stability.

Regional bank stocks face pressure from rising credit costs and narrowing net interest margins. Investors are monitoring whether peers show similar small business stress patterns or if First Bank's experience reflects idiosyncratic underwriting issues.

Q1 2026 earnings reports will reveal if the small business charge-off trend broadens across regional banks. Portfolio composition shifts take quarters to materialize, meaning 2025's origination pivot will reshape bank balance sheets through 2026.

Banks with concentrated small business exposure face potential write-downs if economic conditions deteriorate. Unemployment remains low, but small business sentiment surveys show weakening confidence as refinancing costs squeeze operating margins.

The lending pullback reduces credit availability for smaller firms while channeling capital to established corporates. Banks are choosing profitability over growth in small business segments where credit losses now exceed risk-adjusted returns.

What we know · the intelligence behind this page
Live from the substrate
What we're seeing
AI Leadership Exodus Rattles Investor Confidence Amid Capex Boom
High-profile departures at top AI labs — Brad Lightcap's exit from OpenAI and an unnamed researcher's departure from Alphabet/Google that triggered a share-price drop — are surfacing talent retention as a market risk factor even as hyperscalers pour record capital into AI infrastructure. The reaction shows investors treating key-person risk at frontier AI labs as material to valuation, a new fragility layered onto an otherwise bullish AI-driven capex cycle.
Our read on the data ›
Signals we're tracking
EPKINLY Regulatory-Clinical Success Cascade
High probability of expanded label indications, additional combination approvals, and competitive positioning strength in follicular lymphoma market. Predicts positive commercial uptake and potential accelerated review for related indications.
Patterns we're watching ›
Where sources disagree
Broadcom Inc.
Both facts report EPS for Broadcom Inc. for the same fiscal period (Q1 2026) observed on the same date (2026-02-01). However, they report conflicting values: 1.5 USD per share vs 2.05 USD per share. This is a 37% difference for the identical metric and time period, not a value change over time.
We flag conflicts openly ›
Recently verified
Checked against the original source
4,978
facts traced to their source — and we flag the ones that don't hold up.
101 entities tracked4,978 facts checked against source5,251 source documents archived
Query this data → isubstrate.com