Monday, October 26, 2026
Source trace. Via News points to the documents behind its reporting and shows what we drew from each — so you can check any claim. How we source
Source document· January 22, 2026

D-Wave (QBTS) Q3 2025 Earnings Call Transcript

View original at finance.yahoo.com
D-Wave (QBTS) Q3 2025 Earnings Call Transcript Image source: The Motley Fool. Date Thursday, November 6, 2025 at 8 a.m. ET Call participants Chief Executive Officer — Alan Baratz Chief Financial Officer — John Markovich Need a quote from a Motley Fool analyst?…
Opening lines of the source · short snapshot — read the full document at the original

What we drew from this source

The claims Via News extracted from this document. We point to the source; we don't replace it.

  • BASF achieved production scheduling reduction from 10 hours to seconds, latency reduction of 14%, setup time reduction of 9%, and tank unloading duration reduction of 18%

    80% confidence
  • Q4 2025 bookings to date exceed $12M

    80% confidence
  • Government R&D funding model is not a sustainable business model for quantum computing

    80% confidence
  • Japan Tobacco Pharmaceutical achieved subsecond responses, improved LLM training performance vs classical, and more valid generated molecules vs classical-only approaches

    80% confidence
  • D-Wave can reach profitability with less funding than competitors

    80% confidence
  • D-Wave is the only company building both annealing and gate model quantum systems

    80% confidence
  • North Wales Police achieved 90%+ incidents within target response time, 50% reduction in average response time, and coordination time reduction from 4 months to 4 minutes

    80% confidence
  • D-Wave is 1,000x faster than unnamed ion trap company on same problems, while ion trap performs only as good as classical (not better)

    80% confidence
  • Superconducting technology leverages 50 years of IC manufacturing experience, established supply chains, faster scaling, and lower cost compared to alternatives

    80% confidence
  • Advantage3 testing expected Q4 2025

    80% confidence
  • Superconducting gate qubits are 1,000-10,000x faster than ion trap, neutral atom, and photonic approaches

    80% confidence
  • There has been a shift from foreign-only to U.S. government attention on D-Wave

    80% confidence
  • Davidson partnership would result in first quantum computer certified for classified government work

    80% confidence
  • Scaled error-corrected gate model system has a 5-10 year timeline

    80% confidence
  • D-Wave has 100+ revenue-generating customers in trailing 4 quarters and approximately 24 Forbes Global 2000 customers

    80% confidence
  • 60%+ of D-Wave's patent portfolio is applicable to both annealing and gate systems

    80% confidence
  • D-Wave Advantage2 is the only quantum computer demonstrating supremacy on useful real-world problem

    80% confidence
  • Cryogenic control technology is a unique competitive advantage for D-Wave

    80% confidence
  • D-Wave is only quantum system showing better-than-classical results while others frequently have downtime with multi-hour queue delays

    80% confidence
  • Q-Alliance Italy system purchase price range is $20M-40M if full purchase option exercised

    80% confidence
  • D-Wave is the only quantum company with production-ready applications today

    80% confidence
  • First gate model demonstration expected within coming year (2026)

    80% confidence
  • D-Wave Advantage2 is 1,000x faster than IBM classical and quantum approaches on multi-objective optimization problems while finding higher quality solutions

    80% confidence
  • QCaaS annual capacity exceeds $100M

    80% confidence
  • D-Wave's strong cash position enables organic growth plus M&A opportunities

    80% confidence

Data points we hold from this source

D-Wave Quantum Inc. · warrant remeasurement charge121.9 million_USD
D-Wave Quantum Inc. · adjusted eps-0.17 USD
D-Wave Quantum Inc. · adjusted net loss18.1 million_USD
D-Wave Quantum Inc. · bookings growth qoq80 percent
D-Wave Quantum Inc. · bookings growth yoy3 percent
D-Wave Quantum Inc. · customer count100 customers
D-Wave Quantum Inc. · gaap gross margin71.4 percent
D-Wave Quantum Inc. · gaap gross profit2.7 million_USD
D-Wave Quantum Inc. · noncash charges260 million_USD
D-Wave Quantum Inc. · non gaap gross margin77.7 percent
D-Wave Quantum Inc. · non gaap gross profit2.9 million_USD
D-Wave Quantum Inc. · outstanding warrants count5 millions
D-Wave Quantum Inc. · outstanding warrants value58 million_USD
D-Wave Quantum Inc. · patent portfolio dual applicability60 percent
D-Wave Quantum Inc. · post q3 warrant proceeds21.3 million_USD
D-Wave Quantum Inc. · q4 bookings ytd12 million_USD
D-Wave Quantum Inc. · qcaas annual capacity100 million_USD
D-Wave Quantum Inc. · systems revenue15.5 million_USD
D-Wave Quantum Inc. · warrant proceeds40.3 million_USD
What we know · the intelligence behind this page
Live from the substrate
What we're seeing
Q4 2026 Biotech Catalyst Window: ESMO Data, the Ivonescimab PDUFA and Small-Cap Delistings
Mid-October to November 2026 is a dense catalyst period for clinical-stage biotech. Positive late-stage readouts (ALOFT-IPF, TELIGAN, MIUDELLA, the duvakitug extension) and the ESMO 2026 presentations lead up to the FDA's 14 November PDUFA date for the ivonescimab BLA. At the opposite end of the market, Spago Nanomedical is moving to delist from Nasdaq First North, which shows how hard it is for micro-cap developers to fund themselves. Value is concentrating in companies with late-stage data and near-term regulatory outcomes.
Our read on the data ›
Signals we're tracking
EPKINLY Regulatory-Clinical Success Cascade
High probability of expanded label indications, additional combination approvals, and competitive positioning strength in follicular lymphoma market. Predicts positive commercial uptake and potential accelerated review for related indications.
Patterns we're watching ›
Where sources disagree
Ford Motor Company
Both facts give cash for Ford Motor Company at the same point in time (2025-12-31; FY 2025 year-end and Q4 2025 year-end are the same date). Both are labelled USD, but the values are 23,356,000,000 and 23.356, which cannot both be true in USD. The two numbers agree once the second is read as billions (23.356 bn = 23,356,000,000), so the economic content is consistent and the conflict is a unit/scale error in the Q4 2025 record. The period is not the reason for the conflict: a Q4 and an FY figure at the same year-end date should match.
We flag conflicts openly ›
Recently verified
✓ Checked against the original source
4,994
facts traced to their source — and we flag the ones that don't hold up.
101 entities tracked4,994 facts checked against source5,500 source documents archived
Query this data → isubstrate.com